December 25, 9:00 am，Foreign Academician of the European Academy of Sciences、Part-time Chair Professor of Shandong University、Professor, Department of Asia and Middle East, Duke University, USA、Liu Kang, Director of the Center for China Studies at Duke University, visited the Center for Literary and Aesthetic Research at Shandong University，Brought an academic lecture titled “Chinese Issues of Western Theory—China’s Aesthetic Discourse” to teachers and students of the center。The lecture was hosted by Professor Tan Haozhe, Director of the Literary Aesthetics Research Center，Some graduate students from the center and the School of Liberal Bet365 gamesArts attended the event。
First，Professor Liu Kang briefly discussed the title。The theory is universal，But different from natural science，Humanities theory is very regionally specific，The difference between Chinese and Western theories is still an unavoidable issue for modern scholars。The so-called "Western impact-China response" model also has big problems，China’s theoretical construction is not just a history of responding to Western impact，It is an active choice based on the internal needs of practice and theory，At the same time，This kind of proactive construction has also had a great impact on the international theoretical community，The sensation caused by "Mao Zedong Thought", a typical representative of the sinicization of Marxism abroad，is a good example。Professor Liu Kang thinks，Currently researchers should transcend the binary thinking model，Under the understanding of "China in the world"bet365 online sports betting，Actively carry out research on Chinese aesthetic discourse。
Afterwards，Professor Liu Kang’s construction and transformation of Chinese aesthetic discourse，Proposed three methodological concepts from a macro level，Historicization、Meta-criticism and problematization。First，On the issue of historicization，Professor Liu Kang believes that history is not just history，But historical narrative，Researchers need to have a long history、History of Thought、Perspective of academic history，Pay attention to the emotional concerns of modern Chinese enlightenment，Expand research on the methods and narratives of Chinese aesthetic discourse construction。Secondly，Professor Liu Kang believes that historicist narrative itself is like a conclusion、Content、Structures, etc. also need to be included in historical reflection，And this is metacriticism。Professor Liu Kang sorted out and summarized the bet365 best casino gamesdevelopment of Chinese aesthetic discourse。As early as the Yan'an period，Chinese theoretical discourse has already begun to reflect on Western theory。From the Yan'an Forum on Literature and Art to subsequent literary and artistic construction，Sinicization of Marxism，Always a manifestation of national emotion and ideology，Has deep soil and contemporary needs in China。Marx’s writings have undergone many interpretations，Complex changes have occurred，Researchers should clarify the difference，Cannot just use the word "Sinicization" to generalize the problem。Again，Problemizing means needing to find out the problem，And question it、Criticism and reflection。
Finally，Professor Liu Kang had a conversation with Professor Tan Haozhe。Professor Tan Haozhe continued to elaborate on the three concepts proposed by Professor Liu Kang from the perspective of how to do academics。Professor Tan thinks，Chinese bet365 live casino reviewino blackjackacademic circles are constrained by the discipline system，Narrow the area of thinking，Once you step out of your own circle，Enter the larger academic context，There is often a lack of academic theoretical support at the macro level,The macro-level academic theoretical support proposed by Professor Liu Kang，It is necessary for the Chinese academic community now。
In the interactive session，Professor Liu Kang actively responded to questions from teachers and students。Professor Tan Haozhe expressed his gratitude to Professor Liu Kang for his wonderful lecture，To this point，The lecture ended with warm applause。
